GRL Research Roadmap¶
Last Updated: January 14, 2026
Purpose: High-level plan for GRL research, documentation, and implementation
Current Focus: GRL v0 (Baseline)¶
Status: 🔄 In Progress — Documentation & Formalization
Goal: Complete tutorial paper and reference implementation of the original GRL framework
Part I: Particle-Based Learning¶
Status: ✅ 7/10 chapters complete
| Chapter | Title | Status |
|---|---|---|
| 00 | Overview | ✅ Complete |
| 01 | Core Concepts | ✅ Complete |
| 02 | RKHS Foundations | ✅ Complete |
| 03 | Energy and Fitness | ✅ Complete |
| 04 | Reinforcement Field | ✅ Complete |
| 04a | Riesz Representer | ✅ Complete |
| 05 | Particle Memory | ✅ Complete |
| 06 | MemoryUpdate Algorithm | ✅ Complete |
| 07 | RF-SARSA Algorithm | ⏳ Next |
| 08 | Soft State Transitions | ⏳ Planned |
| 09 | POMDP Interpretation | ⏳ Planned |
| 10 | Practical Implementation | ⏳ Planned |
Priority: Complete Chapters 07-10 by February 2026
Part II: Emergent Structure & Spectral Abstraction¶
Status: 🎯 Foundation laid, rewrite needed
Original Section V topics:
- Functional clustering in RKHS
- Spectral concept discovery
- Hierarchical policy organization
- Experience compression
New formalization available:
- Chapter 5: Concept Projections and Measurements provides mathematical foundation
Next Steps:
- Rewrite Section V content using concept subspace formalism
- Add tutorial chapters on spectral clustering algorithms
- Implement concept discovery in code
Priority: Start after Part I complete (March 2026)
Quantum-Inspired Extensions¶
Status: 🔬 Advanced topics — 9 chapters complete
Goal: Explore mathematical connections to QM and novel probability formulations
Completed Chapters¶
| Chapter | Title | Key Contribution |
|---|---|---|
| 01 | RKHS-Quantum Parallel | Structural mapping between RKHS and QM Hilbert spaces |
| 01a | Wavefunction Interpretation | State vector vs. wavefunction clarity |
| 02 | RKHS Basis and Amplitudes | Why GRL doesn't need Born rule normalization |
| 03 | Complex-Valued RKHS | Interference effects, phase semantics |
| 04 | Action and State Fields | Slicing \(Q^+\) into projections |
| 05 | Concept Projections | Formal subspace theory (foundation for Part II) |
| 06 | Agent State & Belief Evolution | What "the state" is in GRL |
| 07 | Learning Beyond GP | Alternative learning mechanisms |
| 08 | Memory Dynamics | Formation, consolidation, retrieval |
Future Directions from These Chapters¶
1. Amplitude-Based Reinforcement Learning 🔥 High Priority
Motivation: QM's probability amplitude formulation hasn't been applied to RL
Proposal:
- Complex-valued value functions: \(Q^+(z) \in \mathbb{C}\)
- Policy from Born rule: \(\pi(a|s) \propto |Q^+(s,a)|^2\)
- Phase semantics: temporal, directional, or contextual structure
- Interference-based TD updates
Next Steps:
- Expand Chapter 03 with detailed algorithms
- Design toy problems where phase helps
- Implement and benchmark
Target: Paper submission NeurIPS 2026 or ICML 2027
2. Information-Theoretic Memory Consolidation 🔥 High Priority
Motivation: Replace hard threshold \(\tau\) in MemoryUpdate with principled criteria
Proposal:
- MDL objective: \(\min_{\Omega'} \text{TD-error}(Q^+(\Omega')) + \lambda |\Omega'|\)
- Surprise-gated consolidation: store distinct if high TD-error, merge if low
- Adaptive top-k neighbors (density-aware)
Next Steps:
- Implement MDL consolidation algorithm
- Compare: hard threshold vs. soft vs. top-k vs. MDL vs. surprise-gating
- Meta-learn consolidation parameters
Target: Paper submission ICML 2026 or NeurIPS 2027
3. Mixture of Experts with Concept-Based Gating
Motivation: Multiple local fields for scalability and modularity
Proposal:
- \(Q^+(z) = \sum_m g_m(z) Q_m(z)\)
- Gate by concept activation: \(g_m(z) \propto \|P_{\mathcal{C}_m} k(z, \cdot)\|^2\)
- Each expert specializes on a concept subspace
Next Steps:
- Connect to Part II concept discovery
- Implement hierarchical composition
- Benchmark on multi-task environments
Target: Part of larger hierarchical RL paper (2027)
4. Hybrid Neural-Particle Architecture
Motivation: Combine scalability of deep nets with fast adaptation of particles
Proposal:
- \(Q^+(z) = Q_\theta(z) + \beta \sum_{i \in \text{recent}} w_i k(z_i, z)\)
- Neural net: long-term memory (slow updates)
- Particle buffer: short-term memory (fast updates, bounded)
Next Steps:
- Implement distillation from buffer to network
- Large-scale continuous control experiments
- Compare to pure GP and pure neural baselines
Target: Practical algorithms paper (2027)
GRL Extensions: Papers A, B, C¶
Status: Paper A ~70% complete, B & C planned
Goal: Extend GRL with operator formalism, scalable algorithms, and applications
Paper A: Theoretical Foundations (Operator Framework)¶
Status: 🟢 Draft Complete (~6,500 words), Figures in Progress
Progress: 70% — Theory done, figures 43%, proofs 40%, experiments 0%
Core Contribution:
- Actions as parametric operators \(\hat{O}_\theta\) (not just parameter vectors)
- Operator algebra: composition, Lie groups, hierarchical skills
- Generalized Bellman equation with energy regularization
- Unification: classical RL as special case
Current State:
✅ Complete:
- Unified draft with all sections
- 3 critical figures implemented (paradigm, operator families, unification)
- Proof outlines
- Figure generation framework
⏳ Remaining Work:
- 4 additional figures (energy landscapes, composition, convergence, policy viz)
- Expand proofs (Appendices A)
- Operator catalog (Appendix B)
- Related work section
- Validation experiments
Timeline:
- January-February 2026: Complete all figures, expand appendices
- March 2026: Run experiments, related work, final polish
- April 2026: Submit to NeurIPS/ICML 2026
Location: dev/papers/paper-a-theory/
Paper B: Algorithms & Implementation¶
Status: ⏳ Planned
Target: ICML/NeurIPS 2026 (Applied Track)
Planned Content:
- Operator-Actor-Critic (OAC) algorithm
- Neural operator architectures (DeepONet, FNO integration)
- Training stability techniques
- Benchmark results (continuous control, physics tasks)
- Ablation studies
Dependencies:
- Requires Paper A theory finalized
- Requires implementation of
src/grl/operators/andsrc/grl/algorithms/
Timeline:
- February-March 2026: Algorithm development
- April-May 2026: Benchmarking
- June 2026: Draft and submit
Paper C: Empirical Applications¶
Status: ⏳ Planned
Target: CoRL/IROS 2026 (Robotics/Applications)
Planned Content:
- Real-world robotic manipulation
- Fluid control problems
- PDE-governed systems
- Physics-based environments
- Interpretability analysis (energy landscapes, concept activation)
Dependencies:
- Requires Paper B algorithms
- Requires mature implementation
Timeline:
- April-June 2026: Application experiments
- July 2026: Draft and submit (CoRL deadline)
Implementation Roadmap¶
Status: 🔄 Basic structure in place, algorithms pending
Goal: Reference implementation of GRL v0, classical RL recovery, and modern applications
Environment Simulation Package¶
Vision: Comprehensive environment package supporting:
- Validation: Classical RL baselines (CartPole, Pendulum, MuJoCo)
- Strategy: Modern applications (RLHF, prompt optimization, molecule design)
- Innovation: GRL-native domains (physics simulation, field control)
Package Structure:
src/grl/envs/
├── validation/ # Tier 1: Reproduce classical RL
│ ├── nav2d.py # 2D navigation (Priority 7) ⭐⭐
│ ├── cartpole.py # DQN validation
│ ├── pendulum.py # SAC validation
│ └── mujoco_envs.py # Robotics (Ant, Humanoid)
│
├── strategic/ # Tier 2: Modern RL applications 🔥
│ ├── llm_finetuning.py # RLHF for LLMs ⭐⭐⭐ HIGHEST PRIORITY
│ ├── prompt_opt.py # Prompt optimization
│ ├── molecule_design.py # Drug discovery
│ └── nas.py # Neural Architecture Search
│
├── novel/ # Tier 3: GRL-native applications
│ ├── physics_sim.py # Force field control
│ ├── fluid_control.py # PDE-governed systems
│ ├── image_editing.py # Parametric transforms
│ └── multi_robot.py # Multi-agent coordination
│
├── wrappers/ # Adapters for existing environments
│ ├── gym_wrapper.py # OpenAI Gym → GRL
│ ├── gymnasium_wrapper.py# Gymnasium → GRL
│ ├── dm_control_wrapper.py # DeepMind Control → GRL
│ └── rlhf_wrapper.py # TRL/transformers → GRL
│
└── scenarios/ # Predefined configurations
├── paper_scenarios.py # Original paper scenarios
├── benchmark_suite.py # Standard benchmarks
└── tutorials.py # Teaching examples
Key Design Principles:
-
Wrappers enable GRL on any existing RL environment
-
Strategic environments target commercially relevant problems
- Scenarios provide reproducible experiments
Implementation Roadmap¶
Phase 1: GRL v0 Baseline (Current)¶
Target: March 2026
Modules:
| Module | Status | Description |
|---|---|---|
grl/kernels/ |
✅ | Kernel functions (RBF, Matern, etc.) |
grl/particles/ |
🔄 | Particle memory management |
grl/fields/ |
🔄 | Reinforcement field computation |
grl/algorithms/memory_update.py |
⏳ | MemoryUpdate algorithm |
grl/algorithms/rf_sarsa.py |
⏳ | RF-SARSA algorithm |
grl/envs/ |
🔄 | Test environments |
Priority Tasks:
- Complete MemoryUpdate implementation
- Implement RF-SARSA
- Add sparse GP variants
- Create tutorial notebooks
Phase 2: Scalable Learning (March-April 2026)¶
Goal: Implement alternative learning mechanisms from Chapter 07
Tasks:
- Kernel ridge regression
- Online SGD on weights
- Sparse methods (LASSO, inducing points)
- Hybrid (neural + particle)
Phase 3: Memory Dynamics (April-May 2026)¶
Goal: Implement principled memory consolidation from Chapter 08
Tasks:
- Soft association (no hard threshold)
- Top-k adaptive neighbors
- MDL consolidation
- Surprise-gated formation
- Memory type tags (factual/experiential/working)
Phase 4: Operator Framework (May-July 2026)¶
Goal: Implement Paper A operator formalism
Tasks:
- Operator base classes
- Operator families (affine, field, kernel, neural)
- Composition and algebra
- Operator-Actor-Critic (OAC)
Phase 5: Applications (August 2026+)¶
Goal: Benchmarks and real-world demos
Tasks:
- Continuous control tasks
- Physics-based simulations
- Robotic manipulation (if hardware available)
- Transfer learning experiments
Documentation Structure¶
Goal: Multi-level documentation for different audiences
Public Documentation (docs/)¶
Tutorial Papers:
docs/GRL0/tutorials/— Part I: Particle-Based Learningdocs/GRL0/quantum_inspired/— Advanced topics (QM connections)docs/GRL0/paper/— Suggested edits for original paperdocs/GRL0/implementation/— Implementation notes
Future:
docs/theory/— Operator formalism theory (from Paper A)docs/algorithms/— Training algorithms (from Paper B)docs/tutorials/— Quick start guides
Private Development (dev/)¶
Current Work:
dev/GRL0/— Private notes for GRL v0 developmentdev/papers/— Paper drafts (A, B, C)dev/GRL_extensions/— Extension ideasdev/references/— Original paper, related papers
Code Documentation¶
- README files in
src/grl/subdirectories - Docstrings in code (NumPy style)
- Tutorial notebooks in
notebooks/ - API reference (Sphinx, future)
Research Themes & Connections¶
Theme 1: Functional Learning¶
Across all work:
- State as function \(Q^+ \in \mathcal{H}_k\)
- Operators on function spaces
- RKHS as mathematical foundation
Papers: GRL v0, Paper A, quantum-inspired extensions
Theme 2: Particle-Based Inference¶
Key insight: Weighted particles as basis for belief state
Papers: GRL v0, memory dynamics (Chapter 08)
Extensions:
- Sparse approximations
- Hierarchical particles
- Nonparametric clustering
Theme 3: Energy-Based Learning¶
Key insight: Energy function \(E(z) = -Q^+(z)\) connects to physics
Papers: GRL v0 (Chapter 03), Paper A (least action principle)
Extensions:
- Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman PDEs
- Conservative vector fields
- Lagrangian mechanics for policy
Theme 4: Hierarchical Abstraction¶
Key insight: Concepts as subspaces in function space
Papers: GRL v0 Part II, concept projections (Chapter 05), MoE (Chapter 07)
Extensions:
- Multi-scale representations
- Transfer learning via shared basis
- Compositional behaviors
Theme 5: Quantum-Inspired Probability¶
Key insight: Amplitude-based learning with phase and interference
Papers: Quantum-inspired chapters (01-04), potential standalone paper
Extensions:
- Complex RKHS for RL
- Born rule for action selection
- Spectral methods for concept discovery
Strategic Applications: Demonstrating GRL's Generality¶
Goal: Show that GRL subsumes classical RL and applies to modern, commercially relevant problems.
Application 1: Recovering Classical RL 🔥 Critical for Adoption¶
Motivation: Researchers trust frameworks that generalize what they already know.
Objective: Demonstrate that Q-learning, DQN, PPO, SAC, RLHF are special cases of GRL.
Deliverables:
- Document: Recovering Classical RL from GRL ✅ Complete
- Implementation: Wrappers for Gym/Gymnasium environments
- Validation: Reproduce classical results (±5% performance)
- Q-learning on GridWorld
- DQN on CartPole
- SAC on Pendulum
- PPO on continuous control
Timeline: Q2 2026
Impact:
- Convinces classical RL researchers GRL is not alien
- Provides clear migration path from classical to GRL
- Enables GRL to leverage existing benchmarks
Application 2: RLHF for LLMs (Theoretical Connection + Future Direction)¶
Status: Theoretical connection established, implementation exploratory
Why This Matters:
- Validation: RLHF (ChatGPT, Claude, Llama) is most commercially important RL application
- Familiarity: Most ML researchers understand this problem
- Generality: If GRL generalizes RLHF theoretically, it validates framework's breadth
Theoretical Formulation:
- State: \(s_t\) = (prompt, partial response)
- Action: \(\theta_t\) = token ID (discrete action space)
- Augmented space: \((s_t, \theta_t)\)
- Field: \(Q^+(s_t, \theta_t)\) = expected reward for token \(\theta_t\) in context \(s_t\)
- Key insight: Standard RLHF (PPO) is GRL with discrete actions + neural network approximation
Documentation:
- Recovering Classical RL from GRL — Section 6 covers RLHF
Potential Advantages (Theoretical):
- Off-policy learning (replay buffer of human feedback)
- Kernel generalization (transfer across prompts)
- Uncertainty quantification (exploration where uncertain)
- Interpretability (energy landscapes)
However: These are speculative without empirical validation.
Implementation Reality:
Challenges:
- Infrastructure complexity (reward model, human feedback data)
- Computational cost (expensive even for GPT-2)
- Integration with existing tools (TRL, transformers, accelerate)
- Validation difficulty (matching PPO requires extensive tuning)
Estimated Effort: 6-12 months of focused work with GPU resources
When to Pursue:
- ✅ After GRL validated on simpler environments
- ✅ If collaborators or funding available
- ✅ If clear path to demonstrating advantages
Realistic Alternative:
- Write theoretical articles justifying the connection
- Toy RLHF-like problem (not real LLM) as proof-of-concept
- Wait for opportunities (industry collaboration, research grant)
Application 3: Additional Modern RL Domains¶
Prompt Optimization:
- Parametric prompt generation (continuous in embedding space)
- GRL learns smooth prompt space
- Transfer across tasks
Molecule Design:
- Parametric molecular operators
- GRL discovers optimal molecules for drug properties
- Physics-informed kernels
Neural Architecture Search:
- Compositional architecture operators
- GRL explores architecture space efficiently
- Uncertainty-guided search
Timeline: Q4 2026+
Potential Novel Contributions (Publishable)¶
High-Priority Contributions¶
1. Amplitude-Based Reinforcement Learning 🔥 Top Priority
- Novelty: First RL with complex-valued value functions
- Venue: NeurIPS/ICML 2026-2027
- Readiness: 30% (theory done, needs implementation)
2. Information-Theoretic Memory Consolidation
- Novelty: MDL framework for experience replay
- Venue: ICML/NeurIPS 2026-2027
- Readiness: 40% (formulation clear, needs experiments)
3. Operator-Based GRL (Paper A)
- Novelty: Actions as operators, not symbols
- Venue: NeurIPS/ICML 2026
- Readiness: 70% (draft complete, figures/experiments needed)
Medium-Priority Contributions¶
4. Theoretical Articles: Modern RL as Special Cases of GRL
- Novelty: Justify that RLHF, prompt optimization, NAS, molecule design are GRL special cases
- Venue: Blog posts, workshop papers, or sections in main papers
- Readiness: 50% ("Recovering Classical RL" document provides template)
- Impact: Demonstrates GRL's generality without requiring full implementations
5. Concept Subspaces for Hierarchical RL
- Novelty: Rigorous RKHS subspace formalism
- Venue: ICLR/AISTATS 2027
- Readiness: 50% (math done, algorithms needed)
6. Surprise-Modulated Episodic Memory
- Novelty: Bio-inspired consolidation
- Venue: CogSci/Neural Computation 2027
- Readiness: 60% (theory clear, needs validation)
7. Hybrid Neural-Particle RL
- Novelty: Combining deep learning with GP memory
- Venue: ICLR/ICML 2027
- Readiness: 30% (concept clear, full implementation needed)
Strategic Applications (Future Possibilities, No Timeline)¶
8. GRL for LLM Fine-tuning (RLHF)
- Novelty: Application of functional RL to most commercially important RL problem
- Venue: ICLR/NeurIPS (if pursued)
- Readiness: 20% (theoretical connection clear, implementation requires major resources)
- Status: Exploratory — pursue only if collaborators/funding available
- Alternative: Write theoretical articles + toy proof-of-concept
9. Other Strategic Applications
- Prompt optimization, molecule design, neural architecture search
- Status: Theoretical connections to be documented
- Implementation: Pick 1-2 if resources available
- Primary Value: Demonstrate GRL generalizes modern RL methods
Timeline Summary¶
2026 Q1 (January-March)¶
Focus: Complete GRL v0 documentation and baseline implementation
- ✅ Finish Part I tutorial chapters (07-10)
- ✅ Implement MemoryUpdate and RF-SARSA
- 🔄 Run first experiments
- 🔄 Complete Paper A figures and proofs
2026 Q2 (April-June)¶
Focus: Paper A submission, Classical RL recovery, scalable algorithms
- Submit Paper A (April deadline)
- Implement wrappers for Gym/Gymnasium (recover classical RL)
- Reproduce DQN on CartPole (validation)
- Reproduce SAC on Pendulum (validation)
- Document: "Recovering Classical RL from GRL" 🔥 Strategic
- Implement alternative learning mechanisms (Chapter 07)
- Implement memory dynamics (Chapter 08)
- Draft Paper B algorithms
- Start benchmark experiments
2026 Q3 (July-September)¶
Focus: Paper B submission, novel contributions, extensions
- Submit Paper B (June ICML or September NeurIPS)
- Explore amplitude-based RL (if promising after Part I complete)
- Implement MDL consolidation (principled memory dynamics)
- Concept-based MoE (mixture of experts via subspaces)
- Start operator framework implementation
- Run application experiments for Paper C
- Write theoretical articles: How RLHF/prompt-opt/NAS are special cases of GRL
2026 Q4 (October-December)¶
Focus: Paper C submission, novel contributions (amplitude/MDL)
- Submit Paper C (CoRL deadline ~July)
- Develop amplitude-based RL fully
- Implement MDL consolidation
- Draft standalone papers on extensions
2027+¶
Focus: Consolidate results, broader impact
- Package releases and documentation
- Workshop papers and tutorials
- Integration with popular RL libraries
- Real-world applications
Success Metrics¶
Short-Term (6 months)¶
- Complete GRL v0 tutorial paper (Parts I & II)
- Reference implementation working on 3+ environments
- Submit Paper A to top venue
- At least 10 GitHub stars
Medium-Term (12 months)¶
- Paper A accepted or under review
- Papers B & C submitted
- 2-3 additional papers on extensions (amplitude, MDL, concepts)
- 50+ GitHub stars, some external users
Long-Term (24+ months)¶
- 3+ papers published at top venues
- GRL adopted by other researchers
- Integration with popular libraries (Stable-Baselines3, RLlib)
- Tutorial at major conference (NeurIPS, ICML)
- Real-world deployment (robotics, control systems)
Open Questions & Research Opportunities¶
Theoretical Questions¶
- Sample complexity: How does GRL compare to classical RL theoretically?
- Convergence rates: Can we prove faster convergence in certain settings?
- Operator algebra: What's the right group structure for operator composition?
- Phase semantics: What should complex phase represent in amplitude-based RL?
Algorithmic Questions¶
- Scalability: Best way to handle millions of particles?
- Consolidation criterion: MDL vs. surprise-gating vs. other?
- Mixture of experts: How to partition concept subspaces automatically?
- Transfer learning: Can concept basis enable zero-shot transfer?
Application Questions¶
- Best domains: Where does GRL shine vs. classical RL?
- Interpretability: Can energy landscapes help explain decisions?
- Safety: Can concept subspaces encode constraints?
- Multi-agent: How to extend GRL to multi-agent settings?
Resources & References¶
Key Papers (Original Work)¶
- Chiu & Huber (2022). Generalized Reinforcement Learning. arXiv:2208.04822.
Inspirations¶
Kernel Methods:
- Rasmussen & Williams (2006). Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning.
Operator Learning:
- Lu et al. (2021). Learning Nonlinear Operators via DeepONet. Nature Machine Intelligence.
- Li et al. (2021). Fourier Neural Operator. ICLR.
Quantum-Inspired ML:
- Cheng et al. (2018). Quantum Generative Adversarial Learning. PRL.
- Havlíček et al. (2019). Supervised Learning with Quantum-Enhanced Feature Spaces. Nature.
Memory & Agent Systems:
- Cao et al. (2024). Memory in the Age of AI Agents. arXiv:2512.13564.
Contact & Collaboration¶
Documentation: docs/
Code: src/grl/
Papers: dev/papers/
Issues: GitHub Issues (coming soon)
This roadmap is a living document and will be updated as research progresses.
Last Updated: January 14, 2026